From opinion to proof
- “Carriers will love this”Opinion22
- 12 carriers interviewedConversations48
- 3 signed letters of intentCommitment71
- 2 paying pilotsRevenue88
TokenRosterFor entrepreneurship educators
Students who think like investors, and leave ready to raise.
Your students assess their own ventures the way an investor would, then practise the whole fundraising process — profile, data room, follow-up — before they graduate.
Set up with our team · Built on your rubric
Example · What students learnIllustrative
What students learn
Investor thinking, applied to their own ventureIs the idea worth pursuing?
Feedback on the problem, the market and the solution: is the pain real, is it big enough, and why this approach.
Can this team pull it off?
Feedback on execution: team, customer evidence and business model — what investors look for once they like the idea.
What actually convinces an investor
Every score names the evidence that would raise it, so students learn what persuades, not just what they got wrong.
Example · What every team gets backIllustrative
Assessment report
SampleTeam Loop
ENT 310 rubric · 6 criteria68of 100
SolidGreen flags
- Specific, well-evidenced pain for owner-operators
- Clear wedge: carriers with 1–10 trucks
Red flags
- No customer commitments yet
- Pricing untested against broker fees
Recommendation
Strong concept. Before the final pitch, turn interviews into letters of intent and test one price point.
Illustrative scores. Every report explains each score, and what would raise it.
What every team gets back
An investor-style report on their venture, scored against your rubricA score for every criterion
Each part of the venture is scored and weighted the way you teach it, so teams see where they stand and why.
Green flags and red flags
What an investor would find convincing, and what would make them hesitate — in plain language.
What to do next
A recommendation that names the evidence to go after before the final pitch.
Example · Practise the investor processIllustrative
4 documents
- PDFpitch-deck-v3.pdfPitch deck
- PDFfinancial-model.pdfFinancials
- DOCXcustomer-interviews.docxCustomer research
- PDFmarket-sizing.pdfMarket research
Last 14 days
- Viewers
- 3
- Opens
- 14
- Access requests
- 9
- Didn’t open
- 1
Access requestsOpens
- Guest investorVerified7 opens
- Course mentorVerified4 opens
- Program directorVerified3 opens
- Unrecognised addressUnverifiedDidn’t open
Opened it seven times. Students learn this is the follow-up investors expect.
Practise the investor process
Once they have their feedback, they take it to investorsPresent the company
Each team builds a company profile — the same page investors see when they look a startup up.
Prepare the data room
Teams organise the deck, financials and research an investor would ask for, and decide who gets access.
Respond to the review
They read an investor-style assessment, revise their pitch, and run it again — the loop founders go through before every raise.
Example · Follow every teamIllustrative
ENT 310 rubric · Submissions
5 submissions
| Company | Submitted by | Run | Score | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiln Energy | A. Mensah | Oct 14 · 3:12 pm | 84 | View report |
| Tidewater Analytics | J. Park | Oct 14 · 11:40 am | 79 | View report |
| Orbit Health | S. Ortiz | Oct 13 · 9:05 pm | 72 | View report |
| Team Loop | R. Chen | Oct 13 · 4:27 pm | 68 | View report |
| Basil Foods | L. Nguyen | Oct 12 · 8:51 pm | 61 | View report |
Follow every team
See who’s submitted, how they scored, and read any reportSee who’s submitted
Every submission through your class link, with who sent it and when it ran.
Compare at a glance
Scores side by side across the class, so you know which teams need help before the final pitch.
Read the full report
Open any team’s report — the same one they see — for office hours, one-to-ones or grading.
Example · How it worksIllustrative
ENT 310 rubric
- Problem20%
- Market15%
- Solution15%
- Team15%
- Customer evidence20%
- Business model15%
Submit your venture
Drop your pitch deckor paste your website
/programs/ent-310Copy link
Team Loop ran a report on ENT 310 rubric
A report against your framework finished. Score: 68 of 100.
View submissionsHow it works
From syllabus to scored submissionsBring your rubric
We turn your criteria into a framework, weighted the way you teach it.
Share your class link
Teams submit a pitch deck or website through your program page. No new tool to teach.
Review every team
Submissions arrive scored and explained, ready for one-to-ones, class discussion or grading.
Questions
Does the AI grade my students?
No. It gives every team a consistent, explained assessment against your rubric. The grade is yours.
Is this really how investors think?
The framework follows what early-stage investors weigh — problem, market, team, traction, business model — and you adjust it to what you teach. It is a structured second opinion, not a funding decision.
What do my students need to do?
Open your class link and submit a pitch deck or website. They create an account at the end, and their documents stay in a private data room they control.
Their ventures are very early. Is that a problem?
No. Your framework can weight what matters at this stage, and low execution scores come with an explanation of what evidence would raise them.
Running a program beyond the classroom?
For programs →Accelerators, funds and grant programs use the same frameworks to score applicants.
Send them out ready for their first raise.
Show us your rubric and we’ll set it up so your next class graduates knowing what investors look for, and how to work with them.
Book a demo